Ford have just announced a new production plant in Dagenham to employ 3000 people making a new green Diesel engine.
Whatever happens we will just have to live with it but the short term answer is not electric. Over half of all NOx emissions are due to electricity production and heating at the moment.
It must be those same 17 member states that Jaguar had in mind when they claimed the diesel engine is being demonised
Given that the UK government, along with others no doubt, will need to take some action to address the issue and head off the imposition of a fine by the ECOJ. What might they do ? Maybe we will all be in electric and hybrid cars sooner than some might have thought
Makes no sense to compare NOx emitted 100 miles away from a city center and 250 feet above ground from a powerplant smoke stack, with NOX emitted right at the city center and 12 inches from the ground by a car tail pipe.Over half of all NOx emissions are due to electricity production and heating at the moment.
It is plain Bernard that you have not accepted the solution to the above emissions problem set out in the Green party election manifestoWhatever happens we will just have to live with it but the short term answer is not electric. Over half of all NOx emissions are due to electricity production and heating at the moment.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-32512152
Not your fault for not understanding UK problems but there are two issues. The government has just been told by our highest court that they must comply with the EU limits on NO2 emissions which are over the limit in 17 cities and regions. Three cities have emissions well over the limit due to diesel cars but overall the UK is suffering due in part to power stations contributing over 50% of the total.Makes no sense to compare NOx emitted 100 miles away from a city center and 250 feet above ground from a powerplant smoke stack, with NOX emitted right at the city center and 12 inches from the ground by a car tail pipe.
That is like saying desert rats (the animal, not the 8th Army) are as much a health problem as rats roaming around London.
I would take more note of the Green Party if they kept well out of politics and concentrated on issues such as you mention. Their manifesto is beyond a joke, but no politics, I only mention it because you did.It is plain Bernard that you have not accepted the solution to the above emissions problem set out in the Green party election manifesto
Put simply we need to do more to reduce demand by taking a leaf out of the Scandinavian countries books and properly insulate homes and by embracing new technology to utilise natural energy.
Well thousands of diesel car owners have learned that the beloved Mayor of London has confirmed plans to charge nearly all diesel drivers a daily ÂŁ12.50 charge on top of the ÂŁ11.50 congestion chargeI would take more note of the Green Party if they kept well out of politics and concentrated on issues such as you mention. Their manifesto is beyond a joke, but no politics, I only mention it because you did.
your analogy is not apt, perhaps not the same thing as inept.Makes no sense to compare NOx emitted 100 miles away from a city center and 250 feet above ground from a powerplant smoke stack, with NOX emitted right at the city center and 12 inches from the ground by a car tail pipe.
That is like saying desert rats (the animal, not the 8th Army) are as much a health problem as rats roaming around London.
In fact the limits relate to emissions in cities and background concentrations in regions of which we are in breach of limits in 16 as I remember. Some are vast areas and power stations play an important part. I agree about old Diesel engines also lack of proper attention during MOT tests.HI Bernard, I think Piker does understand, the EU limits are determined by concentrations in the cities not by output. The output by the power stations doesn't affect the concentrations in the cities (measureably). The issue is entirely down to old diesel engines moving too slowly. If all the old diesel engines were replaced by modern engines (electric, hybrid, pegtrol or even diesel) it would probably be OK. The next Government should basically make running old diesel engines uneconomical. The intentional slowing down of traffic in city centres (traffic calming) to discourage driving into cities has not helped matters either.
Interesting that today in The Times the car maker Nissan has a full page advert for the Leaf electric car and, a few pages on, Toyota have a half page advertising their Auris hybrid. And as I write this Classic fm the radio station has just broadcast an advert for another electric car, missed the brand.There's no doubt that hybrid power trains currently just being released onto the market and those contemplated probably by all manufacturers in the very near future are the answer to vehicle pollution in crowded European city centres. The capability of electric only drive for a range of around 10-20 miles specifically suits the particular requirements of these areas. Since stop and go traffic is continuous in those areas hybrid drivetrains are the best solution. All electric is better if you can have a City car only and an IC powered car for ex urban use.
Such drivetrains make no sense over here. For example, my local city of 1.1 m inhabitants sprawls over a land area exceeding 400 sq miles. Current hybrid range would mean I would run out of electricity before I left town.
It follows all the publicity over the last two days. When opportunity knocks.......... Or strike whilst the iron is hot. Take your choice.Interesting that today in The Times the car maker Nissan has a full page advert for the Leaf electric car and, a few pages on, Toyota have a half page advertising their Auris hybrid. And as I write this Classic fm the radio station has just broadcast an advert for another electric car, missed the brand.
Quite soIt follows all the publicity over the last two days. When opportunity knocks.......... Or strike whilst the iron is hot. Take your choice.
The planet, in all likelihood, will be around and do just fine, regardless of what we do. We are no more that a mild irritant for the planet.Do you save the people or the planet? What's your answer?
You are quite right and the sensible environmental and economic solution today is the greater take up of hybrid and electric vehiclesThe answer is clear. We should do all we can for the clear and present health negative health effects that are affecting people today, first.
This reminds me of:The planet, in all likelihood, will be around and do just fine, regardless of what we do. We are no more that a mild irritant for the planet.