The plot thickens... :In fact I am a little disappointed about the EQC re. range.
https://www.vg.no/forbruker/bil-baat-og-motor/i/pLMQQX/test-av-elbiler-store-elbiler-luksus-elbilerVG continuously tests new and existing electric vehicles in the market. Now we have also measured how the cars can handle the fast charge. Here, there is a lot of difference between the best and the worst - and between "advertising" and reality.
- I wonder to whom they could be referring? The Gamechanger with 470/480 km WLTP and reality of around 330 km, and sub-100 kWh 'fast' charging?
I'm guessing the final score, ranking was, out of 6:
EQC - 6, first
etron - 5, second
I-Pace - 4, last
Unfortunately the article is paywalled - '39/75 Kr'? - seems a lot.
But, they have also done a separate article on the individal test of the EQC, and given it '6', as on a die/dice, so presumably 6 out of 6:
https://www.vg.no/forbruker/bil-baat-og-motor/i/kJdQb6/test-av-mercedes-eqc-ny-elbil-i-toppklasse"Mercedes EQC is a small price bomb among premium electric cars. This is VG's judgment of the newcomer in the top class"
So... , I'm imagining the reference to 'a lot of difference', 'between advertising and reality', is aimed primarily/solely at the I-Pace.
Perhaps someone could subscribe, or find a copy on a Norwegian/Scandinavian site on Facebook.