Besides the fact that these people are insane, barking mad - 'the best 2 jags' - it just illustrates why the I-Pace is so thirsty in reality, against its fraudulent 300 miles DfT-certified 'fact':
https://www.ipaceforums.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=2510
It's basically an oversize brick, with the edges chamfered, real Cd 0.3 or higher, due to being on a 5m+ XJ/full-fat Range Rover platform, hence the 3 metre wheelbase, and why JLR/Callum tried desperately to reduce its awful Cd and frontal area by basically just lopping the roof off, and hence why its headroom is a joke, and why it has no pano roof cover.
Real EVs, whether the Cd 0.25 Model X or the 0.22 Taycan, and the coming near 0.20 Mercedes EQS, are why these cars have much greater range in reality, especially once average speeds go above 50 mph.
The aeroplane-derived Jags of the 50s and 60s were the antithesis of the I-Pace, hence the incongruity of the picture.
The Taycan shows a resemblance to the near same vintage as the E-type 911. The I-Pace has nothing to do with the 1968 XJ, never mind the E-type.
People, other than these barking creatures, don't fall for this rubbish - 'the I-Pace is a Jag' - as 'it has a growler badge and a Jag grille, and its name references and pays homage to the 'Grace, Pace and Space '68 XJ'.
The I-Pace looks what it is, a bloated, cynical attempt to peddle a bespoke EV, which is actually an oversize ICE platform, with a few styling tricks - bonnet scoop and showy roof spoiler.
Far from being one of 'Jag's best 2 cars ever', it's an abomination, and insult to the real Jaguar tradition.
Callum, Speth, Tata have shat on Jag's heritage from a great height, crowned by this turkey bloater.
Everyone else, whether BMW, Mercedes, Porsche, Maserati, Alfa... , make cars that try to continue a line, whilst having to deal with the savage influence of aero drag on design, especially for EVs.
The ID.3, even with its monstrous roof spoiler, tries to reference the Golf. The Taycan, the 911, as said. The EQS will follow Merc's years, decades-old 'Vision' cars, and its low-aero cars going back to the early 70s, and the first oil crisis.
The I-Pace popped out of nowhere, as it was just a bodged and cynically sold 'bespoke' EV, with no link to any Jaguar.
The I-Pace is a dead end, and would have died within a few years anyway. Its actual job was to get JLR sold, along with its sister car, the booted, lowered version, the 'eXJ'.
Showering the I-Pace with awards - the most awarded car ever - and saying it changed everything - like a Model T, Beetle, Golf or 2011 Tesla Model S - and was going down a storm with critics and buyers, was all just about getting JLR off Tata's hands, and onto some idiot's.
It was the cornerstone of a huge pump and dump operation, involving not just Tata and JLR, but also of course basically the whole gobal media, all of the UK state, from 'The Royals' on down, and all the 'financial analysis' crowd, from Bloomberg to Reuters to as we've seen most recently, the 'prestigious' Bernstein Research, no doubt getting big bucks from the Tatas and Mistrys to try to bounce BMW into taking JLR from Tata, after the attempt with the muppet Tavares at PSA failed, once the owners woke up and realised what their CEO clown was doing - repeating the disaster of acquiring GM Europe to the power of ten.
So the I-Pace's purpose is over. It's dead, null, didn't happen as a real car thing - or whatever the old biddy in the court said - 'it never happened'.
Indeed, the I-Pace 'never happened', and was 'unlawful' - a 300 miles, 100 kW, SOTA fraud.
Too bad the gimps in the courts of this land don't look into real matters. But that would take real work, in real things - can't have that.